Using digital tools to assess urban resilience
the impact of areas susceptible to flooding on urban connectivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37916/arq.urb.vi39.658Keywords:
City Information Modeling (CIM), urban resilience, inundation susceptibility areasAbstract
With increasing extreme weather events, resilient cities – cities that managed to create climate change-adapted environments and reduce disaster risks – have become a constant theme for debate on urban planning. On the other hand, digital tools significantly impacted the cities' management systems whether through georeferencing tools or three- dimensional modeling. In this scenario, the study explores the possibility of building a tool to assess the impact of areas at risk of flooding on urban space connectivity and access to schools in the city of Juiz de Fora, Brazil. A composition of QGIS software, for recording environmental data, and the Rhinoceros 3D modeler plus its Grasshopper plugin, created the virtual tridimensional space and the analysis required to calculate landscape metrics for assessing local resilience. The results confirm the applicability of digital tools for assessing the urban space and the scalability of the solution, whether in territorial thematic or terms.
Downloads
References
ABDUL-RAHMAN, A e PILOUK, M. Spatial data modeling for 3D GIS. Berlin: Springer, 2007.
ALLEN, E. Measuring the New Urbanism with Community Indicators. In: PABLE B., MCCLENDON,
B. W. (ed.). Planning 1997: Contrasts and Transitions. Proceedings of the APA National Planning Conference. San Diego: American Planning Association, 1997
ANTROP, M. Van EETVELDE, V. Landscape Perspectives, The Holistic Nature of Landscape. Dordrecht: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1183-6_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1183-6
BENEDICT, M. A.; MCMAHON, E. T. Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities. Washington: Islands Press, 2006. Pp. 109-14.
BOLSTAD, P. GIS Fundamentals - A First Text on Geographic Information Systems. Ann Arbor: XanEdu, 6a. ed., 2019.
TWADDELL, H. et al. Guidebook for Measuring Multimodal Network Connectivity. Washington D.C: U.S. Department Of Transportation, 2018. 76 p.
CARDILLE, J. A. e TURNER, M. G. Understanding Landscape Metrics I. in: GERGEL, S. E. e TURNER, M. G. Learning Landscape Ecology: a Practical Guide to Concepts and Technique. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21613-8_7
CERVERO, R. e KOCKELMAN, K. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research D, v.2, 1997, p. 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361- 9209(97)00009-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
CERVERO, R. e RADISCH, C. Travel Choices in Pedestrian Versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods. Transport Policy, v.3, 1995, 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967- 070X(96)00016-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-070X(96)00016-9
CPRM - SERVIÇO GEOLÓGICO DO BRASIL. Cartas de Suscetibilidade a Movimentos Gravitacionais de Massa e Inundações da Cidade de Juiz de Fora. Brasília: Ministério de Minas e Energia - Secretaria de Geologia, Mineração e Transformação Mineral, 2022.
CRAMPTON, J. Cartography: maps 2.0. Progress in Human Geography. n.33, v.1, 2009, Pp. 91–100. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508094074
CSORBA, P. e SZABÓ, S. The Application of Landscape Indices in Landscape Ecology. In: TIEFENBACHER, J. P. Perspectives on Nature Conservation – Patterns, Pressures and Prospects. London: IntechOpen, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/36182
DE JONG, M., et al. Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon–eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production,
v. 109, 2015, p. 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004. DEMERS, M.N. GIS For Dummies®. Hoboken: Wiley Publishing, 2009.
DILL, J. Measuring Network Connectivity for Bicycling and Walking. In: TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD (org.). Transportation Research Board 83rd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Transportation Research Board: Washington DC, 2004.
DRAMSTAD, W. et al. Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning. Washington DC: Island Press, 1996.
EASTMAN, C. M. et al. Manual de BIM: Um Guia de Modelagem da Informação da Construção para Arquitetos, Engenheiros, Gerentes, Construtores e Incorporadores. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2014.
EWING, R. Best Development Practices: Doing the Right Thing and Making Money at the Same Time. American Planning Association: Chicago, 1996.
FARINA, A. Principles and methods in landscape ecology. London: Chapman & Hall, 1998. FARINA, A. Landscape ecology in action. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8984-0
FORMAN, R. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscape and Regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107050327
FORMAN, R. T. T., e GODRON, M. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology.
BioScience n. 31, v. 10, 1981, Pp. 733-740. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1308780 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1308780
FRANK, L. D. et al. Linking land use with household vehicle emissions in the central Puget Sound: methodological framework and findings. Transportation Research Part D, v.5, 2000, p.173-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00032-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00032-2
GIL, J.; ALMEIDA, J.; DUARTE, J. The backbone of a City Information Model (CIM): Implementing a spatial data model for urban design. In: Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, 29., 2011, Ljubljana. Proceedings...Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana/ Faculty of Architecture, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2011.143
GODSCHALK, D. R. Urban Hazard Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities. Natural Hazards Review,
v. 4, n. 3, 2003, p. 136–143. http://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
GREEN, D. G. et al. Complexity in Landscape Ecology. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006.
GUNDERSON, L. H. e HOLLING, C. S. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington DC: IslandPress, 2002.
HANDY, S. Urban form and pedestrian choices: Study of Austin neighborhoods. Transportation Research Record, v.1552, n.1, 1996, p.135-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196155200119
IALE - International Association for Landscape Ecology. About IALE. Acesso em 25/02/2021: https://www.landscape-ecology.org/about-iale.html
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Demográfico 2022: população e domicílios: primeiros resultados. Brasília: IBGE, 2023. Acesso em 03/03/2024: https://censo2022.ibge.gov.br/apps/pgi/#/mapa/
LANG, S. et al. Landscape metrics - A toolbox for assessing past, present and future landscape structure. In: BENDER, O. et al. Geoinformation Technologies for Geocultural Landscapes - European Perspectives, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203881613.ch10
LAURINI, R. Some Philosophical Issues Regarding Geometric Modeling for Geographic Information and Knowledge. In: TAMBASSI, T. The Philosophy of GIS. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16829-2_2
LIMA, F. et al. Lógica algorítimica-paramétrica e urbanismo: uma revisão teórica e de modelos computacionais para projetos urbanos. Gestão e Tecnologia de Projetos, São Carlos, v.15, n. 2, p.84-97, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/gtp.162710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/gtp.v15i2.162710
LOOKINGBILL, T. R. et al. Connectivity in the Urban Landscape (2015–2020): Who? Where? What? When? Why? and How? Current Landscape Ecology Reports, v. 7, n. 1, 2022, p. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-021-00068-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-021-00068-x
LU, P.; & STEAD, D. Understanding the notion of resilience in spatial planning: A case study of Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Cities, v. 35, p. 200–212. 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
MATELY, M. et al. Pedestrian Travel Potential in Northern New Jersey. Transportation Research Record, v.1705, n.1, 2000, p.1-8. https://doi.org/10.3141/1705-01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/1705-01
METZGER, J. P. O QUE É ECOLOGIA DE PAISAGENS? Biota Neotropica, v.1, n.1, 2001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032001000100006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032001000100006
O'NEILL, R. V. Theory in landscape ecology. In: WIENS, J.A. e MOSS, M.S. Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
REILLY, M.; LANDIS, J. The Influence of Urban Form and Land Use on Mode Choice - Evidence from the 1996 Bay Area Travel Survey. Berkeley: University of California, 2002.
ROCHA, N. A. et al. Conflitos das dinâmicas de transformação urbana e ambiental à luz da ecologia da paisagem. PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção, Campinas, v. 7, n. 1, 2016. PP. 23-34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20396/parc.v7i1.8644222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/parc.v7i1.8644222
SIQUEIRA, M. N. et al. Geografia e Ecologia da Paisagem: Pontos para Discussão. Sociedade e Natureza, v. 25, n. 3, 2013. Pp. 557-566. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1982-45132013000300009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1982-45132013000300009
SONG, Y. Impacts of Urban Growth Management on Urban Form: A Comparative Study of Portland, Oregon, Orange County, Florida and Montgomery County, Maryland. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, 2003.
TAYLOR, P. D. et al. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos, n. 68, 1993. Pp. 571-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3544927
UNDRR - UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Resiliência a Catástrofes - Ferramenta de Auto-Avaliaçao a Nível Local: Avaliação de Nível Detalhado. 2017. Acesso em 22/03/2022: https://mcr2030.undrr.org/sites/default/files/2021- 08/UNDRR_Disaster%20resilience%20scorecard%20for%20cities_Detailed_Portuguese%20Ver sion_updated15April2021.pdf
WAMSLER, et al. Planning for climate change in urban areas: from theory to practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 50, 2013, p. 68–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su6031359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
XU, X. et al. From Building Information Modeling to City Information Modeling. Journal of Information Technology in Construction v.19, n.16, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Leonardo Sanches, José Ripper Kós
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors hold copyright without any restrictions, being required to inform the initial publication in this journal in the event of a new publication of any work.