Urban Mobility Policies: identification of evaluation criteria of cyclomobility policies and actions.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37916/arq.urb.vi25.9Keywords:
Cycle mobility, Criteria for Mobility Assessment, Bicycles, Urban mobility, Urban Mobility ManagementAbstract
The valuation of non-motorized modes of transport has been evident in the federal, state and municipal government spheres, and has stimulated the discussion on cycling mobility, where, amidst the chaos in urban mobility caused by the automobilebased circulation model, governments to include in a significant way public policies, legislation and actions aimed at cycling mobility with new alternatives to problems associated with urban mobility. However, there is a gap in Brazil regarding the need to establish criteria to evaluate the evolution of the implementation of policies and actions of cycling mobility in municipalities. In this way, the study proposes, based on Brazilian legislation and national and international experiences, to establish criteria that allow the evaluation of the policies and actions of cyclomobilization implemented, in order to be an applicable instrument in the municipalities.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. MINISTÉRIO DAS CIDADES. Resolução nº 34, de 1º de julho de 2005. Diário Oficial da União: Brasília, DF. 4 p. Disponível em: < https:// www.cmc.pr.gov.br/down/pd_resolucao_federal_ 34-2005.pdf>. Acesso em: 13 ago. 2017.
BRASIL. MINISTÉRIO DAS CIDADES. Lei no 12.587, de 3 de janeiro de 2012. Institui as diretrizes da Política Nacional de Mobilidade Urbana (PNMU). Disponível em: < http://www.planalto. gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12587. htm>. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2018.
BRASIL. Constituição (1988). Emenda Constitucional nº 90, de 15 de setembro de 2015. Dá nova redação ao art. 6º da Constituição Federal, para introduzir o transporte como direito social. Disponível em: < http://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/ fed/emecon/2015/emendaconstitucional-90- -15-setembro-2015-781520-publicacaooriginal- 148098-pl.html>. Acesso em: 12 set. 2018.
CASLEY, Denis; KUMAR, Krishna. Project Monitoring and Evaluation in Agriculture. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1987.
COPENHAGENIZE. The Copenhagenize Index: Bicycle Friendly Cities Index 2017. 2018. Disponível em: < http://copenhagenizeindex.eu/01_ copenhagen.html#>. Acesso em: 15 out. 2018.
CROW, Ede. Record 27: Manual de Diseño para el Tráfico de Bicicletas, 2011. < https:// pt.slideshare.net/ArchVicky/crow-record-27-manual- de-diseo-para-el-trfico-de-bicicletas-2011- -lr> Acesso em: 15 out. 2018.
GAETE, Constanza Martínez. As 20 cidades mais preparadas para o ciclismo urbano segundo o Ranking Copenhagenize 2015. Site de arquitetura Archdaily – on line, 17 de novembro de 2015. Disponível em: < https://www.archdaily. com.br/br/770915/as-20-cidades-mais-amigaveis- do-mundo-com-as-bicicletas-segundo-o-
-ranking-copenhagenize-2015>. Acesso em: 02 out. 2018.
GARCIA, Ronaldo Coutinho. Subsídios para organizar avaliações da ação governamental. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, Brasília, 2001. Disponível em: < http://www.campinas.sp.gov. br/arquivos/recursos-humanos/txt_apoio_ronaldo_ garcia.pdf>. Acesso em 15 out. 2018.
GEIPOT. Empresa Brasileira de Planejamento de Transportes. Planejamento Cicloviário: Diagnóstico Nacional. Brasília, 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors hold copyright without any restrictions, being required to inform the initial publication in this journal in the event of a new publication of any work.