Proposal for Epistemological review of John Ruskin ́s theory
Keywords:
pedagogy, logic, history, designAbstract
The hypothesis in this study lies on the fact that John Ruskin’s mainly deals with a conception of logic and reasoning as groundings to understand fields of work like architecture, painting, politics, economy, and religion among others. Unlikely other modern architecture historians who reviewed the Ruskinian architecture work quite separately and unattached to other subjects, this study will provide an understanding to the common logic and reasoning working as a framework for all these fields. It is intended to demonstrate that Ruskin’s objectives were not related to building up a theory of nature, painting, economical politics, or even architecture, but about using the same logic of composition all over these subjects.
Downloads
References
AMARAL, C. S. John Ruskin e o desenho no Brasil. Tese de Doutorado. São Paulo: Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo, 2005.
BACHELARD, G. [capítulo], v. 3. In: REALE, G.; ANTISERI, D. História da filosofia: do romantismo até nossos dias. São Paulo: Paulinas, 1991.
BRADLEY, J. Ruskin, the Critical Heritage. Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.
CASTERAS, Susan P.; GORDON, Susan Phelps; GULLY, Anthony Lacy; HEWISON, Robert; LANDOW, George P.; NEWALL, Christopher. John Ruskin and the Victorian Eye. Nova York: Harry Abrams, 1993.
HASLAM, R. Looking, Drawing and Learning with John Ruskin at the Working Men’s College. Journal of Art & Design Education, Oxford (RU), v. 7, n. 1, 1988.
HELSINGER, E. Ruskin and the Art of the Beholder. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press, 1982.
HERSEY, G. Ruskin as an Optical Thinker. In: HUNT. The Ruskin Polygon. Manchester (RU): Manchester University Press, 1982.
HUNT. The Ruskin Polygon. Manchester (RU): Manchester University Press, 1982.
MOREIRA, R. O que é geografia. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1994.
PENNY, N. Ruskin’s Drawings. Oxford: Ashmolean Museum, 1997.
PIMENTA, P. P. G. A linguagem das formas: ensaio sobre o estatuto do belo na filosofia de Shaftesbury. Tese de Doutorado. São Paulo: Dep. de Filosofia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, 2002.
QUILL, S. Ruskin’s Venice, the Stones revisited. Londres: Ashgate. 2000.
RUSKIN, J. Modern Painters, v. 1. Londres: Smith, Elder, 1948.
_____________ . Modern Painters, v. 2. Londres: Smith, Elder, 1856.
_____________ . Modern Painters, v. 3. Londres: Smith, Elder, 1856.
_____________ . Modern Painters, v. 4. Londres: Smith, Elder, 1856.
_____________ . Modern Painters, v. 5. Londres: Smith, Elder, 1860.
_____________ . The Stones of Venice, 3 vs. Londres: George, Allen & Unwin, 1925.
_____________ . Las siete lámparas de la arquitectura. Buenos Aires: El Ateneo, s/d.
_____________ . The Seven Lamps of Architecture. Londres: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1921.
_____________ . Munera Pulveris. Londres: Routledge/Thoemmes, 1994a.
_____________ . A Joy for Ever. Londres: Routledge/Thoemmes, 1994b.
_____________ . Sesame and Lilies; The Two Paths; The King of the Garden. Londres: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1944.
_____________ . The Crown of Wild Olive. Londres: Routledge/Thoemmes, 1994c.
_____________ . Unto This Last. Londres: Routledge/Thoemmes, 1994d.
_____________ . Lectures on Architecture and Painting. Londres: Smith, Elder, 1854.
THOMPSON, E. P. William Morris Romantic to Revolutionary. Londres: Lawrence & Wishart, 1955.
VITRÚVIO POLIÃO, M. Da arquitetura. Trad. e notas de M. A. Lagonegro. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1999.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Claudio Silveira Amaral
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors hold copyright without any restrictions, being required to inform the initial publication in this journal in the event of a new publication of any work.
